Built around the way Texas educators review IEP documentation.
IEP Verify uses a Texas-focused review framework to compare IEP documentation against the available evidence and identify meaningful gaps, alignment concerns, and areas that may require educator attention.
Evidence before assumptions.
The framework is designed to evaluate whether IEP documentation is materially supported by the records provided for review.
Two questions drive every audit.
IEP Verify separates the quality of the evidence package from the alignment of the IEP documentation itself.
Is the evidence ready?
IEP Verify reviews whether the available supporting information is sufficient to meaningfully evaluate the IEP documentation.
- Teacher input
- Parent input when available or expected
- Student input when available or expected
- Evaluation and case information
- Other supporting evidence provided for review
Does the documentation align?
IEP Verify evaluates whether the major IEP sections materially reflect and align with the evidence supplied for the review.
- Needs reflected in the PLAAFP
- Vision and goals connected to documented needs
- Accommodations tied to supporting evidence
- Services reflected in the documentation
- Recommended TEKS aligned to the documented instructional need
Focused on meaningful alignment, not paperwork perfection.
The framework is designed to distinguish material documentation concerns from optional opportunities to add more detail.
Evidence-Based
Findings are grounded in the records provided for the review rather than assumptions about the student.
Material Alignment
The review focuses on whether the documentation meaningfully reflects documented student needs, supports, and educational decisions.
Section-to-Section Consistency
IEP Verify looks for meaningful connections across the PLAAFP, vision, goals, accommodations, services, and recommended instruction.
Conflicts and Omissions
The framework identifies unsupported statements, conflicting information, missing evidence, and material needs that appear to have been omitted.
Professional Judgment
Audit findings are designed to help qualified educators focus their review. They do not replace professional decision-making.
Clear Next Steps
When an area needs attention, the audit explains why it matters and what should be reviewed before finalizing the documentation.
Review the IEP as a connected record.
Each section is evaluated individually while also considering how it connects to the broader evidence and IEP.
Does the present-level documentation materially reflect the student needs shown in the available evidence?
Does the vision reflect the documented priorities and direction for the student?
Are goals connected to documented needs and supported by the information provided?
Are accommodations supported by documented student needs and consistent with the evidence?
Are documented services reasonably connected to the needs and supports reflected in the record?
Are recommended instructional standards connected to documented needs, goals, and instructional priorities?
A review tool — not a compliance certification.
IEP Verify supports professional documentation review. It does not determine legal compliance, replace an ARD committee or qualified educator, or verify that documented services, accommodations, or supports were implemented.
The framework is designed with reference to Texas Education Agency guidance and Texas special education documentation practices. IEP Verify is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Texas Education Agency.
Know what is supported. Know what needs attention.
Use IEP Verify to bring evidence and documentation together in one focused review.